Introduction: Law and Mental Health |
|
1 | (18) |
PART I. PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES AND INVOLVEMENT IN BASIC COURTROOM PROCEEDINGS |
|
19 | (36) |
|
Chapter 1 Jury Selection and Process: Precedent Impacting Jury Consultation and Research |
|
|
21 | (15) |
|
|
|
The Case of the Mitchell—Stans Conspiracy Trial: The Importance of Consistent Jury Selection Procedures |
|
|
26 | (5) |
|
The Case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986): Juror Race in Jury Selection |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
Chapter 2 Admission of Expert Testimony and the Eyewitness |
|
|
36 | (19) |
|
|
|
The Case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993): The Evolution of Qualifications for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
The Case of Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999): Clarifying the Applicability of Daubert |
|
|
43 | (7) |
|
The Case of People v. LeGrand (2002): General Acceptance in a Field and a Misapplication of Expert Testimony |
|
|
50 | (5) |
PART II. LEGAL PRECEDENT IN EVERYDAY CLINICAL PRACTICE |
|
55 | (36) |
|
Chapter 3 Informed Consent |
|
|
57 | (13) |
|
|
|
The Case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Importance of Disclosure |
|
|
58 | (7) |
|
The Case of Zinermon v. Burch (1990): The Importance of Capacity |
|
|
65 | (5) |
|
Chapter 4 Confidentiality and Privileged Communication |
|
|
70 | (11) |
|
|
|
The Case of In re Lifschutz (1970): Therapist—Patient Privilege and Privilege Waiver |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
The Case of Jaffee v. Redmond (1996): Broadening Therapist—Client Privilege |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
Chapter 5 Duty to Warn and Protect |
|
|
81 | (10) |
|
|
|
The Case of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California (1976): Dangerousness to Others and the Duty to Warn and Protect |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
The Case of Almonte v. New York Medical College (1994): Duty to Warn and Protect a Nonspecified Victim |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
The Case of Garner v. Stone (1973): Confidentiality and the Duty Not to Warn and Protect |
|
|
89 | (2) |
PART III. CLINICAL FORENSIC EVALUATION |
|
91 | (70) |
|
|
93 | (21) |
|
|
|
The Case of Dusky v. U.S. (1959): Defining Competency to Stand Trial |
|
|
95 | (11) |
|
The Case of Godinez v. Moran (1993): The Constitutional Basis for Separate Competencies |
|
|
106 | (8) |
|
Chapter 7 Insanity and Criminal Responsibility |
|
|
114 | (13) |
|
|
|
The Case of In re M'Naughten (1843): The First Formal Test of Criminal Responsibility |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
The Case of John Hinckley: Public Outcry Spurring Insanity Defense Reform |
|
|
120 | (7) |
|
Chapter 8 Civil Commitment and Dangerousness |
|
|
127 | (16) |
|
|
|
The Case of O'Connor v. Donaldson (1975): The Criteria for Involuntary Commitment |
|
|
131 | (8) |
|
The Case of Foucha v. Louisiana (1992): Dangerousness and Mental Illness as Criteria for Indefinite Commitment |
|
|
139 | (4) |
|
Chapter 9 Hypnosis and the Polygraph |
|
|
143 | (18) |
|
|
|
The Case of the Hillside Strangler: The Veracity of Hypnosis in a Forensic Setting |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
The Case of Rock v. Arkansas (1987): U.S. Supreme Court Acknowledgment of Hurd Criteria |
|
|
151 | (6) |
|
The Case of U.S. v. Scheffer (1998): Polygraph Admissibility in the Wake of Frye and Daubert |
|
|
157 | (4) |
PART IV. CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LAW |
|
161 | (44) |
|
Chapter 10 Sexual Orientation and Civil Rights |
|
|
163 | (15) |
|
|
|
The Case of Kentucky v. Wasson (1992): State Extension of Privacy and Equal Protection Rights in the Absence of Federal Protection |
|
|
166 | (5) |
|
The Case of DeLong v. DeLong (1998): Maintaining the "Best Interests of the Child" |
|
|
171 | (7) |
|
Chapter 11 Personal Injury: Court Proceedings and Assessment of Psychological Damages |
|
|
178 | (13) |
|
|
|
The Case of Dillon v. Legg (1968): Redefining the "Zone of Danger" for Emotional Damages |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
The Case of Molzof v. U.S. (1992): Collecting Damages for "Lost Pleasure of Life" |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
The Case of BMW v. Gore (1996): Guidelines for Calculating Punitive Damages |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Chapter 12 Prisoners' Rights to Medical and Mental Health Treatment |
|
|
191 | (14) |
|
|
|
The Case of Vitek v. Jones (1980): Due Process and Civil Commitment of Prisoners |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
The Case of Washington v. Harper (1990): Due Process and Involuntary Medication of Prisoners |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
The Case of Riggins v. Nevada (1992): Forced Medication to Achieve Competency |
|
|
198 | (7) |
PART V. SPECIFIC MENTAL DIAGNOSES IN THE LAW |
|
205 | (46) |
|
Chapter 13 Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Dependence |
|
|
207 | (12) |
|
|
|
The Case of Robinson v. California (1962): Is Being Addicted a Crime? |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
The Case of Montana v. Egelhoff (1996): Voluntary Intoxication and Criminal Intent |
|
|
213 | (6) |
|
Chapter 14 Mental Retardation |
|
|
219 | (15) |
|
|
|
The Case of Pennhurst State School and Hospital: The Slow Start on the Path to Civil Rights and Remedies |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
The Case of Youngberg v. Romeo (1982): A Constitutional Right to Treatment and Services |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
The Case of Atkins v. Virginia (2002): Execution of Offenders with Mental Retardation |
|
|
227 | (7) |
|
Chapter 15 Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality Disorder |
|
|
234 | (17) |
|
|
|
The Case of John Wayne Gacy: An Illustration of Psychopathy in a Serial Murderer |
|
|
238 | (13) |
PART VI. VIOLENT CRIMINALS AND VIOLENT CRIME |
|
251 | (48) |
|
Chapter 16 Criminal Psychological Profiling |
|
|
253 | (16) |
|
|
|
The Case of the Mad Bomber |
|
|
253 | (7) |
|
The Case of Pennell v. State of Delaware (1991): Profile "Fit" Establishes Probable Cause to Investigate |
|
|
260 | (9) |
|
Chapter 17 The Death Penalty |
|
|
269 | (16) |
|
|
|
The Case of Furman v. Georgia (1972): Procedural Technicalities and Death Penalty Constitutionality |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
The Case of Gregg v. Georgia (1976): The Importance of Aggravating Circumstances |
|
|
273 | (4) |
|
The Case of Wainwright v. Witt (1985): Striking Jurors for Death Qualification |
|
|
277 | (8) |
|
Chapter 18 Sex Offenders: Community Notification and Predator Commitment |
|
|
285 | (14) |
|
|
|
The Case of New jersey v. Timmendequas (1999): Spurring Community Notification Legislation |
|
|
287 | (6) |
|
The Case of Kansas v. Hendricks (1997): The Constitutionality of Sexual Predator Laws |
|
|
293 | (6) |
PART VII. JUVENILES IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM |
|
299 | (64) |
|
Chapter 19 Juvenile Law and School Law |
|
|
301 | (18) |
|
|
|
The Case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954): The Inequality of "Separate but Equal" |
|
|
307 | (12) |
|
Chapter 20 Capital Punishment of Juveniles |
|
|
319 | (15) |
|
|
|
The Case of Thompson v. Oklahoma (1998): A Minimum Age for Capital Punishment |
|
|
320 | (4) |
|
The 1989 Cases of Stanford v. Kentucky and Wilkins v. Missouri: Capital Sentencing of 16- and 17-Year-Olds |
|
|
324 | (5) |
|
The Case of Roper v. Simmons (2005): Abolishing the Juvenile Death Penalty |
|
|
329 | (5) |
|
|
334 | (15) |
|
|
|
The Case of Landeros v. Flood (1976): Mandated Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse |
|
|
336 | (2) |
|
The Case of DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989): A Duty to Protect? |
|
|
338 | (4) |
|
The Case of State v. Huss (1993): Child Testimony and Suggestibility |
|
|
342 | (7) |
|
|
349 | (14) |
|
|
|
The Case of Painter v. Bannister (1966a, 1966b): Establishing the Concept of "Psychological Parent" |
|
|
351 | (6) |
|
The Case of Santosky v. Kramer (1982): Standard of Proof for Terminating Parental Rights |
|
|
357 | (6) |
References |
|
363 | (18) |
Index |
|
381 | |