CHAPTER I ILLUSTRATIONS OF BELIEF IN MAGIC IN MEDIIEVAL AND IN EARLY MODERN TIMES |
|
|
General belief in witchcraft, in astrology, and in the existence of magicians |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Even the most educated men believed in astrology |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Further illustration of such beliefs among men of learning, and even among scientists |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Bacon's acceptance of astrology |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Bacon's belief in occult influence |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Vincent de Beauvais, Bernard Gordon, Albertus Magnus, Arnald of Villanova |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Cabalistic doctrines of Renaissance scholars |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Paracelsus and Tycho Brahe |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Question whether they are all closely connected |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Question whether they were regarded by their authors as magic |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
CHAPTER II MAGIC; ITS ORIGINS, AND RELATIONS TO SCIENCE |
|
|
Magic once regarded as a reality |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Magic praeternatural rather than supernatural |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Belief in magic perhaps older than belief in divine beings |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Magic not originally a secret art |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Attitude of primitive man towards nature |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
His effort to explain strange phenomena |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
His belief in lucky things |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
His desire to know the future |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Renee the probable origin of belief in magic |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Chief characteristics of magic |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Difficulty in defining magic |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Gradual disappearance of magic before science |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Possible union of magic and science |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Importance of union of magic and science |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Method of treating that theme in this essay |
|
|
36 | (1) |
CHAPTER III PLINY'S NATURAL HISTORY |
|
|
A fitting starting-point for our discussion |
|
|
37 | (19) |
|
I. The Character of the Work: |
|
|
|
Its extensive treatment of both science and magic |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Objections to regarding it as a true picture of ancient science |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Reasons for so regarding it |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Pliny the Boswell of ancient science |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Pliny's relation to mediaeval science |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
II. Pliny's Discussion of Magic: |
|
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Pliny's remarks concerning the history of magic |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
"Magic" false, according to Pliny |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
"Magic" an obscene and criminal art, according to Pliny |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
III. Illustrations of Pliny's Fundamental Belief in Magic: |
|
|
|
Inconsistency of his declared scepticism |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
His belief that animals possess magic properties |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
His belief that plants have similar occult virtues |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Strange qualities of minerals |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Efficacy of magical ceremonial |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Pliny's belief unmistakable |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Question as to extent of his belief in astrology |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
His account of the heavenly bodies |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Influence of the stars upon our planet |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Influence of the stars upon man |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Belief of Pliny in portents |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Attitude of Pliny towards various popular superstitious observances |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Conclusions to be drawn from the Natural History |
|
|
54 | |
CHAPTER IV SOME ANTECEDENTS OF THE BELIEF IN MAGIC IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE |
|
|
Derivative and cosmopolitan character of intellectual life during the imperial period |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Extent of our discussion of its antecedents |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Question as to freedom of Greek thought from magic |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Some evidence to the contrary |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
Doctrines of the Stoics favorable to magic |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Pythagorean theory of numbers |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Attitude of Plato towards "magic," as he understood the word |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Plato's fantastic view of nature |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Aristotle's acceptance of astrology |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Aristotle's History of Animals |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (2) |
CHAPTER V BELIEF IN MAGIC IN THE EMPIRE |
|
|
Outline of contents of this chapter |
|
|
65 | (24) |
|
|
|
Prejudice against "magic" and condemnation of Magi |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Views of Apuleius and of Philostratus |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
In reality a widespread belief in magic |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Explanation of apparent opposition to astrology |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Philosophy confounded with magic |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
II. Philo of Alexandria and Allegorical Interpretation: |
|
|
|
Question as to connection of allegorical interpretation with magic |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Historical importance of allegorical interpretation and of Philo |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Nature of Philo's allegorical interpretation |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
His influence in the Middle Ages |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
III. Seneca's Problems of Nature and Divination: |
|
|
|
Scientific traits of Seneca |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
His tendency to be esoteric and mystical |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Ground covered by his book |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
His partial rejection of magic |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
His acceptance of divination |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
His discussion of divination from thunder |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
IV. Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos and Astrology: |
|
|
|
An illustration of the astrology of the scientist |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Ptolemy and his influence |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Scientific tone of the preliminary remarks in the Tetrabiblos |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
An attempt to base astrology upon natural law |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Ptolemy's explanation of the influence of the planets |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Summary of remaining contents of his first book |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Contents of the other three books |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
V. The Hermetic Books and Occultism: |
|
|
|
Their nature and history, legendary and actual |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
CHAPTER VI CRITICS OF MAGIC |
|
|
Review of the usual attitude towards magic in the Roman Empire |
|
|
88 | (11) |
|
I. Opponents of Astrology: |
|
|
|
Cicero, Favorinus and Sextus Empiricus |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Considerations which discount their scepticism |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Inadequacy of their arguments |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Astrology attacked as being impracticable |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
General problem of sidereal influence left untouched |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
II. Cicero's Attack upon Divination: |
|
|
|
In a way an attack upon magic as a whole |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Form and arrangement of De Divination |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Its relations to the past and to the future |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Appeal of Quintus to antiquity and to tradition |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Cicero's reply; condemnation of reliance on tradition |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Divination declared quite distinct from science |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Divination declared quite contrary to the laws of science |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Idea of magical sympathy rejected |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Cicero's attitude very unusual for his time |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Question as to his consistency |
|
|
98 | |
CHAPTER VII THE LAST CENTURY OF THE EMPIRE |
|
|
Intellectual characteristics of the period |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
His description of the state of learning at Alexandria |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
His justification of divination as a science |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
His extraordinary misquoting of Cicero |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
His belief that all parts of the universe are in magic sympathy |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Further instances of his trust in magic |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (2) |
CHAPTER VIII CONCLUSION |
|
108 | |